Firefighter Arrested In Connection With Rapes
This article was published on Monday, January 29, 2007 8:16 PM CST in News
By Richard Dean Prudenti
The Morning News
* Email this story
* Print this story
* Comment on this story
BENTONVILLE -- A Bentonville firefighter resigned Friday, a day after he was arrested for allegedly raping two women.
Kevin Edward Thomasson, 33, of Pea Ridge was arrested Thursday by Rogers police in connection with the two counts of felony rape.
Bentonville Fire Chief Dan White deferred questions about the resignation to city staff attorney Camille Thompson on Monday.
"No, sir. I sure can't comment, by order of the mayor," White said by phone.
Thomasson began working full time for the fire department in July 2001, and was previously a part-time firefighter there and a lieutenant for the Pea Ridge Fire Department.
Thompson could say little more than to confirm that Thomasson had resigned.
*
"Basically, it's still an ongoing police investigation by an outside agency and a personnel matter, so there's nothing we would get involved in. Our employee matter resolved itself by the resignation," Thompson said.
"None of the activities that are alleged were on-duty type activities. There is no indication that the operations or integrity of the fire department have been affected in any way," Thompson said.
Thomasson is accused of raping a 30-year-old woman on Dec. 28, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed by Detective John Oldfather of the Rogers Police Department. He allegedly entered the woman's bedroom and forcibly grabbed her several times before raping her.
He was working for Arkansas ParaMed Transfer in Rogers during the alleged incident, and afterward talked on a cell phone with his boss about not responding to an ambulance call for service.
In a recorded phone interview, Thomasson reportedly said he did not touch the woman, and noted, "I'm not that kind of guy," the affidavit states.
Rogers police said Thomasson never showed up to a scheduled interview on Jan. 11, nor did he return subsequent phone messages.
The woman's attorney, Alisha Williams, filed a lawsuit against Thomasson on Jan. 9. The woman and her children were granted a protection order from the Benton County Circuit Court against Thomasson which lasts until June 25.
The police investigation led to a second woman accusing Thomasson of raping her twice in Pea Ridge.
Thomasson is set for arraignment March 5 in the Benton County Circuit Court. If charged and convicted, he could face 10 to 40 years, or life, on each count.
He is currently out of the Benton County Jail on a $100,000 bond.
Thomasson was arrested in November 2005 in connection with third-degree domestic battery involving his ex-wife. That charge is set for trial May 27 in the Rogers District Court.
Reader Comments (55)
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of their authors. The Morning News does not review comments before their publication, nor do we guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by our comment policy. If you see a comment that violates our policy, please notify the web editor.
reason wrote on January 30, 2007 1:10 AM:"$100,000 bond is not enough."
Brenda wrote on January 30, 2007 1:34 AM:"Why is he out?? So he can do it again like all the rest? Is there not enough willing women around, that these perverted men have to force themselves on women? We need some very tough laws on rapists enforced. They wouldn't want me on this jury!!"
lawman wrote on January 30, 2007 7:41 AM:"I personally know the victim in this case, and have watched the pain she has went through. It sickens me to know this guy is out roaming the streets as we speak. A member of a public service organization this man could of been in any of our homes in Bentonville, or Pea Ridge. I think we just need to make this as public as possible. The more high profile the case is the better the chance of him getting propper punishment. He has done this in the past, ans will do it again. "
mediamad wrote on January 30, 2007 7:56 AM:"Nothing like jury by media!"
Government Bad wrote on January 30, 2007 8:26 AM:"So why should ANY OF US trust total strangers with information about us? WHY? Because they decided to be "police officers,firefighters" and I had decided to be a plumber, somehow that makes them able to be trusted? Because they are "Homeland Security Operatives" or because they are a "judge" or some other made up wizard position? Because 10,000 idiots voted them into office I should trust them? Or because 10 MILLION idiots voted them into office, that makes it "OK"? How about those who were APPOINTED? Those the idiots didn't get to vote for? How many cops do you know of who were VOTED into their position? How many driver's license employees, State Troopers, or for that matter the head of Homeland Security did the idiots get to vote for? "
Cut man wrote on January 30, 2007 8:26 AM:"Mandatory castration for second offense. They would give that a lot of thought before committing the crime. See the movie "Hard Candy"."
Just someone that knows wrote on January 30, 2007 8:28 AM:"I have to agree with Mediamad. Nothing like jury by media. I personally known the "suspect". What I do know is there are two sides to every story. Let a jury of his peers take care of whether to convict or not. I also know his first wife and the rest of his family. If they thought for one minute he intentionally hurt anyone, they would kick his butt before law enforcement got to him. So before spouting the usual rhetoric found in these blogs, keep in mind the United States Judicial system is "innocent until proven guilty.""
Only the victim and he knows wrote on January 30, 2007 9:00 AM:"None of us that have heard it on the news or read it in the paper really know what happend! I believe that if there is enough evidence to convict him that he will be convicted! I do know of the accused and I believe that it could go either way. I will just wait to see what comes next. I know women who do thing just to get even with the man so I am up in the air."
I agree wrote on January 30, 2007 9:29 AM:"I say that there is 2 parts to every story. Not all men/women that are accused of rape did it. Alot of people say rape to get back at someone for hurting them. I have known a few people that were accused and never did anything to the other person and that was proven. So I say leave the man alone until he is either proven quilty or not!"
justice wrote on January 30, 2007 9:47 AM:"For everyone who claims to know the suspect and say he didnt do. Here is a question for you? If he had nothing to hide why did he not show up for his sceduled interview with the Rogers Police Dept, or return there phone calls. Interesting. Also he has been accused of the same acts by a former wife. The victims have done there part, and I admire them for having the courage to come forward. Now it is The State of Arkansas vs. Thomasson. "
rape is rape wrote on January 30, 2007 10:24 AM:"rape is rape , if a woman tells a man no it means stop not keep going !!!i think rapest need to be "fixed" "
Ty wrote on January 30, 2007 10:33 AM:"Or if a MAN tells a WOMAN no, it is rape. This works both ways."
to ty wrote on January 30, 2007 10:50 AM:"yes it gos both ways ,i know guys/boys get raped, but 9 out of 10 rapes are women"
dad wrote on January 30, 2007 11:34 AM:"Look at the rugby team issue in North Carolina... "supposedly" that was rape too. I'm in mediamad's corner. All evidence needs to be addressed fully. If he's guilty, prosecute him, and put him away. Don't just list his name along with the 279 other sex offenders. Until then, put the castration knives away. "
Been There... wrote on January 30, 2007 12:11 PM:"It doesn't matter if he's nice and get an agreement form the other party. Persuasion is the same as thinking “no” means “yes”. It’s power! “NO” MEANS “NO”. "
What about the Kids wrote on January 30, 2007 12:32 PM:"I would think that if any of you were in this situation you wouldn't want your children to read about the horrible things people are saying about you. Did anyone consider that before posting your guilty verdicts."
to what about the kids wrote on January 30, 2007 12:38 PM:"Hooray. This man has been accused. Not convicted. He is still innocent, and everyone needs to keep THAT in mind. Let the penalty serve the crime, but first make sure a crime has been comitted. Right now, it's the word of two women, and no mention of solid (or liquid) evidence. "
What he is guilty of. wrote on January 30, 2007 1:45 PM:"Rape? Choice of Women? Know the whole story before you convict by media. It is too bad that the character of the two ALLEGED victims cannot be brought to light. Am I saying he's guilty? Absolutely not. Am I saying he's innocent? Absolutely not. I was not there, were you? Media is a business that requires ratings. Facts are not important. What sells ratings is making a public servant into a monster that is going around raping women while on duty. Whether it’s true or not, you don't care because you just want to convict someone. I know all three people involved and he was in long term relationships with both. My jury is still out. Is yours? On the choice of women, Guilty. I personally warned him about both of them a few years ago. I just wished he would have listened. "
Which ex-wife? wrote on January 30, 2007 5:26 PM:"He has only four ex-wives! Yes, he has a history of abusing women. Just look at his criminal record. He should have been fired after the first abuse case."
What happen wrote on January 30, 2007 9:34 PM:"What happened to the article?"
Off the street wrote on January 30, 2007 9:38 PM:"What is it going to take to get this guy off the streets?"
Guilty of Domestic Battery wrote on January 30, 2007 9:43 PM:"He was found guilty of Domestic Battery. "Thomasson was arrested in November 2005 in connection with third-degree domestic battery""
Hopefully wrote on January 30, 2007 9:57 PM:"He resigned from the from Arkansas Paramed Transfer too!"
seems to be a pattern wrote on January 31, 2007 10:19 AM:"...with the accusations. I've never committed an act of rape or criminal violence, and I've never been accused of it. So, what are the odds this individual would be accused as many times as he has and be innocent? Where there's smoke....."
Lisa "Thomasson" Jameson wrote on January 31, 2007 3:30 PM:"And to all you people who have his punishment already lined out...he has already been accussed, tried, and found guilty....he lived to serve his community from being a marine serving his country, to helping protect each and everyone of us through public service...and due to a poor choice in women has had all of that stripped from him without again i would like to point out not a shred of evidence. His life has been ruinned by the word of another human being....imagine if this is what we begin allowing to happen...the media has sacrificed a man..a good man...and made him guilty with no proof at all. His life will never be the same...so please think about that when you are placing a guilty stamp on his name...where will you be when it comes out he is innocent?? will you be there to tell the fire chief you want a good firefighter back on the team?...will you call apt and tell them you want him to have his job back?...will you make his house payments? will you buy things for his son? will you apologize? what will you do for your contribution to this wrongful ruinning of a persons life? and to the media i ask will you be there to ruin the name of the women who falsely accussed? i doubt it!"
never showed up wrote on January 31, 2007 4:31 PM:"Rogers police said Thomasson never showed up to a scheduled interview on Jan. 11, nor did he return subsequent phone messages. "
withheld wrote on January 31, 2007 7:17 PM:"Most proabably due to lawyer counseling to not participate in an interview without counsel present. Just because you don't go to an interview does not make you guilt."
Lisa "Thomasson" Jameson wrote on January 31, 2007 8:50 PM:"to withheld....thank you for being the first person to use their head with regard to the interview and the phone calls...."
Those who live in Glass Houses... wrote on January 31, 2007 10:35 PM:"No mention of the meeting he did have, without his lawyer, with the detective, at his house. No mention of the fact that the detective got the messages from the lawyer about the meeting and said it wasn't his job to call lawyers back, that was the job of the DA. No mention of how they got that "I'm not that kind of guy" sound bite. (watch your phones) This is a man who devoted his entire life to public service, and many of you probably shook his hand and said thank you for wearing a uniform. Now you have crucified him. Think about your son, your brother, your dad being accused of something and watching everything he had ever struggled for taken away by lies. Those lies will lead to the truth eventually. There will be a trial, one day a trial by fire, and God knows the truth."
Those who live in Glass Houses... wrote on January 31, 2007 10:58 PM:"I'm curious as to why the ex-wife never told her brother about the "rape". He's a cop, surely he would have seen justice done at the time of the crime...or maybe, just maybe, it was made up. What if this woman accused her step-father of battery, oh wait, she did. What if when she got divorced from her 3rd husband (she was married 4 times too)she told everyone he was going to kill her...oh yeah, SHE DID! Seems like a pattern to me..."
something is wrong... wrote on February 01, 2007 12:50 PM:"This whole thing with the media printing partial facts and plastering it all over television only to sell papers and increase the viewing audience is wrong. How the media gets a hold of and print quotes from an individual that was said in a private investigation to a detective is wrong. The media should be held accoutable for putting their own spin on things and stick with the facts only. Maybe the police should investigate the backgrounds of both the accusers! How and who taped the phone to come up with that snipet and why was it released to the media? That should not be consider public information at this point during investigations. Everyone assumes that since he is a "MAN", therefore he is quilty and he had to have committed what was said by another individual. You could be the next "MAN", think about. If Ms. Jameson is correct and there was no evidence taken but only accusation by someone who craves attention and has a past history of making false accusations, then something is wrong with this picture and the law. Those women need mental help. I'm praying that the truth comes out for Kevin and if he's guilty then so be it, he'll do his time and shame on him. If not, then both these women should be made to pay two fold and in public for what they have done to an innocent person & his family."
I'm confused ... wrote on February 01, 2007 6:06 PM:"How is the media to blame when they are just reporting that a firefighter resigned after he was arrested on rape charges? That's a fact, not a lie, that he was arrested and was a firefighter. Did the story say he was guilty? Did the reporter write that? I don't see it in there. It seems like all the people who posted on here are more guilty of hanging this guy out to dry rather than the newspaper article that is reporting what court records are stating. Is it because they wrote about the arrest? Is that the only reason? Why should one person's arrest be held back more so than the minority men who have been getting arrested for rape? I didn't read of any concern about how they were going to live and provide for their familes. And remember, they are only accused, too. Not convicted. This firefighter shouldn't receive any special treatment because of what he did for a living. "
Jerry Hawkins wrote on February 02, 2007 7:40 AM:"I've been ostracized by my associates and peers and denied work, my crime, painful lower back injury. These good christians around here know how to ruin a person for any reason."
kt wrote on February 02, 2007 9:39 AM:"It's amazing how people can read of someone being ACCUSED of something and just assume that means they are guilty. To allude, as one of you did, that he should be castrated is appalling. I know his family very well, they are good people. For them to have to read or hear comments like that is absolutely horrible. In this day and age, there are so many small- minded people out there that see something in the news and automatically it must be true. The accused must be guilty. No one looks at the fact that there are two sides to every story. The news can't report on the instability of the woman who is claiming these charges. That would be unfair... right? We can't have all of the facts right? that would be unfair to the "victim" Maybe Kevin's only crime IS picking the wrong women to associate with. And to Guilty of Domestic violence - learn to read! He has not been found guilty of anything. He has been ACCUSED and yet you ASSUME guilt! and strangly enough by the same woman who has accused other people in the past. "
info wrote on February 03, 2007 5:48 PM:"A group of rapists and date rapists in prison were interviewed on what they look for in a potential victim and here are some interesting facts : 1) The first thing men look for in a potential victim is hairstyle. They are most likely to go after a woman with a ponytail, bun, braid or other hairstyle that can easily be grabbed. They are also likely to go after a woman with long hair. Women with short hair are not common targets. 2) The second thing men look for is clothing. They will look for women who's clothing is easy to remove quickly. Many of them carry scissors around specifically to cut clothing. 3) They also look for women on their cell phone, searching through their purse or doing other activities while walking because they are off guard and can be easily overpowered. "
info wrote on February 03, 2007 5:50 PM:"4) Men are most likely to attack & rape in the early morning, between 5:00a.m. and 8:30a.m. 5) The number one place women are abducted from/attacked is grocery store parking lots. Number two is office parking lots/garages. Number three is public restrooms. 6) The thing about these men is that they are looking to grab a woman and quickly move her to another location where they don't have to worry about getting caught. 7) Only 2% said they carried weapons because r ape carries a 3-5 year sentence but rape with a weapon is 15-20 years. 8) If you put up any kind of a fight at all, they get discouraged because it only takes a minute or two for them to realize that going after you isn't worth it because it will be time-consuming. 9) These men said they would not pick on women who have umbrellas, or other similar objects that can be used from a distance, in their hands. Keys are not a deterrent because you have to get really close to the attacker to use them as a weapon. So, the idea is to convince these guys you're not worth it. "
info wrote on February 03, 2007 5:51 PM:"10) Several defense mechanisms he taught us are: If someone is following behind you on a street or in a garage or with you in an elevator or stairwell, look them in the face and ask them a question, like what time is it, or make general small talk: "I can't believe it is so cold out here", "we're in for a bad winter." Now yo u've seen their face and could identify them in a line-up; you lose appeal as a target. 11) If someone is coming toward you, hold out your hands in front of you and yell STOP or STAY BACK! Most of the rapists this man talked to said they'd leave a woman alone if she yelled or showed that she would not be afraid to fight back. Again, they are looking for an EASY target. 12) If you carry pepper spray (this instructor was a huge advoc ate of it and carries it with him wherever he goes,) yell I HAVE PEPPER SPRAY and holding it out will be a deterrent. "
info wrote on February 03, 2007 5:52 PM:"13) If someone grabs you, you can't beat them with strength but you can by outsmarting them. If you are grabbed around the waist from behind, pinch the attacker either under the arm (between the elbow and armpit) OR in the upper inner thigh VERY VERY HARD. One woman in a class this guy taught told him she used the underarm pinch on a guy who was trying to date rape her and was so upset she broke through the skin and tore out muscle strands. The guy needed stitches. Try pinching yourself in those places as hard as you can stand it; it hurts. 14) After the initial hit, always GO for the GROIN I know from a particularly unfortunate experience that if you slap a guy's parts it is extremely painful. You might think that you'll anger the guy and make him want to hurt you more, but the thing these rapists told our instructor is that they want a woman who will not cause a lot of trouble. Start causing trouble, and he's out of there. 15) When the guy puts his hands up to you, grab his first two fingers and bend them back as far as possible with as much pressure pushing down on them as possible. The instructor did it to me without using much pressure, and I ended up on my knees and both knuckles cracked audibly. "
info wrote on February 03, 2007 5:53 PM:"16) Of course the things we always hear still apply. Always be aware of your surroundings, take someone with you if you can and if you see any o dd behavior, don't dismiss it, go with your instincts!!! "
truth hurts dosn't it wrote on February 06, 2007 10:19 AM:"I don't know what happen to the latest blogs but the truth hurts dosn't it."
The Latest Blogs wrote on February 06, 2007 10:48 AM:"You can't use specific names of the people who have left blogs. They can request that they be taken off by the editor. It just goes to show that you can't believe everything you read as the truth. I can only assume that if a blog has been taken off that those mentioned or the subject of the blog may have hit pretty close to home. Everyone should keep in mind that 99% of the blogs left are peoples assumptions, conclusions or persuasive suggestions either for or agains the subject. Too many take it for the gospel and too many are too quick to believe everything that the newspaper reports. It is however, the most neutral because there nornally isn't an agenda one way or the other. In these such instances they are reporting on police reports or records that we can be found by us all."
friend wrote on February 13, 2007 12:30 PM:"No I am not the judge or the jury, but he has been convicted of domestic battery. He is currently on probation.Therefore that alone should have been the cause for loseing his job. Also he resigned. He was not fired. He should consider himself lucky. I know one of the victim's personally. She is a wonderful person. If you are one of the people bashing her credibillity, then you must be getting your info from Kevin. Most people know he lies. Yes lets do let the courts decide. See ya in 15 to 20. "
FRIEND wrote on February 13, 2007 1:17 PM:"SISTERS usually stand up for their brothers. Good people make mistakes. Firefighters make mistakes. MARINES make mistakes. MARINES have a history of domestic abuse, that is why they have so many programs. BUT, good people don't usually have consistant criminal suspicion surronding them! He is not "on public trial" for his service as a Marine or a fireman. Unfortunatly, his good behavior and passion for good didn't carry over into his personal life. He hasn't made 1 bad choice in women...he has made 4 apparently....all having in common - KEVIN. Where is his last ex wife? Have you seen her medical records? Did you pay her bills? Did you help heal her wounds...no...she moved away because she feared her life. Police have done their work and feel there is sufficient evidence to proceed forward. After all, IT IS NOT THE FIRST TIME. I would hope that one might just see that MAYBE he has a problem...one that may even stem from being in war. I would hope that you might HELP him before he kills someone....and then no one can help him. DON'T BE AN ENABLER. OPEN YOU EYES. IT'S NOT A CONSPIRACY TO RUIN KEVIN, THERE IS A PROBLEM. "
Those that live in Glass houses... wrote on February 13, 2007 7:02 PM:"First of all, I'm not his sister. Secondly, his ex's bills have been paid by him. She went to school for 2 years only to fail out both times, who worked 4 and 5 jobs while she slept instead of studied? He did. "MARINES have a history of domestic abuse"? How many Marines do you know? You should never use a blanket statement like that. I also read in the paper that 3 sheriffs shot someone, are they all bad too? She fears for her life every time she gets divorced. I only have one question, you say it's not a conspiracy. Then why do all my comments get erased? Don't you believe that there are truly two sides to the story? You can bad mouth Kevin, but if anyone stands up for him, they get erased. Why do you think that is?"
FRIEND wrote on February 13, 2007 10:23 PM:""GLASS HOUSES" Who said I was speaking to you. I am not referring to his ex's school bills....geez...i'm referring to medical bills from a SEVERE "HOSPTIAL STAY" BEATING. Yes, Marines and alot of military have domestic issues. IT IS A FACT...study it. I, by the way, am a Military brat...how's that for a glass house. My father was Vietnam war vet...I know what I speak. I did not badmouth him, I said...MAYBE THERE IS A PROBLEM. People tend to lie when in trouble and ashamed, it's a protective thing we do. How is it that 3+ women all have the same story with Kevin? hmmmm. BTW, Are you the teenaged girlfriend? What are you 17 now? I hope you aren't next. I hope he changes and gets help."
I take back .... wrote on February 13, 2007 10:54 PM:"the girlfriend comment...."
national statistics wrote on February 14, 2007 4:40 PM:"Do some research............National Statistics state that less than 2% of victims lie about their allegations."
what does happen wrote on February 14, 2007 4:49 PM:"to the blogs? there was one just up there, and then now it's gone! did Kevin used to work for the newspaper too, or maybe that's what he is doing now with all that time!"
Those who are without sin... wrote on February 16, 2007 7:33 AM:"Friend~ I know what I speak. I'm not a military brat, I'm a Active Duty member of the Military. I work with all branches all day long, you know what happened to your dad and what a book said. Regardless of what is posted here, I know Kevin better than any one of you, I would trust him with any of my children, my wife and quite litterally, my life. You may not feel that way, and that's completely up to you, but why do so many people who know someone, or read a story in the paper; why do they feel the need to jump on the bandwagon to tear a man apart? In Novemeber no one had anything bad to say about either party. December was much the same. January came and so many people knew the whole story, knew how he was, knew he was a "monster". It's a sad fact that people love to kick someone when they are down. I encourage you to read your Bible."
PLEASE...... wrote on February 16, 2007 1:17 PM:"We are all sinners....FACT. Don't tell ME to read the bible....loan it to Kevin. Perhaps there is a peace he can find. People always have something to say about people...ALWAYS. I'm glad Kevin is such a great friend to you. It shows he can be what he wants to whom he wants to be it to. FACT - you only know what people want you to know. Now...back to what I know. Military personal that are in combat...not at a cushy on your butt job, have ANGER issues and CONTROL issues. They don't know how to come back to normal, that is why they drink and escape. It was my dad, his friend, his friends friend...blah blah blah.....Now since we're all sitting here encouraging one another. Talk to your friend. Help your friend. People won't say much "the first time".....but they always will say " I told you so" or "I knew something like that would happen" the second, third time..and so on and so on. I encourage YOU to get to the truth...if YOU are any kind of friend at all. It is nothing to be embarassed about.....when someone has a problem and needs help. You should only be embarassed when you do nothing. "
To those who aren't that bright... wrote on February 16, 2007 2:13 PM:"Friend~ again, you show your ignorance. I'm sure your job at Wal-Mart or Home Depot is very taxing, but your able to handle the stress. Unless you have worn a uniform, don't talk to me or try to speak intelligently about the military, you don't know. As far as me being a friend to Kevin and knowing the truth, I do. I have no doubt, becuause I don't just know him, I know her. And the person that you are referring too is truly the definition of a person in need of true mental health care. I'm not being mean about that, it's just fact. We can dispute this all day long on the computer. I look forward to seeing what you say when it all comes to light. I'm SURE that you know how it will all play out. "
WOW wrote on February 16, 2007 4:03 PM:"See what I mean about control. Thanks for proviing my point. I merely stated to help your friend...not her...your friend...and you respond with what you deem an insult. Beware that some WAL MART or HOME DEPOT associates might read and find that insulting and attack you back....talk about ignorance. And why are the victims always mental health issues....aren't you the one that pleaded not to use blanket statements....practice what you preach. And you KNOW the truth...were you there? Tell me...have you ever lied or done something you were ashamed of.....because everyone has. No one is perfect...NO ONE...not even Kevin. Get him off the pedastool that you have placed him on...no one belongs on a pedastool...we are all liars and sinners. Once again young man....look at the facts and quit worrying about what everyone else thinks. If you could spend 1/2 the time with Kevin that you have spent trying to pull up "insults" in your small mind....you might be able to see the full picture. "
too bad wrote on February 16, 2007 4:32 PM:"I find it sad that we actually have people defending Kevin(besides his lawyer who is paid to do so.)To my you who claim to know the "victim" so well, I challenge you. I have been close with her since high school and yes, she has problems as we all do, but NEVER have I seen anything that would support need of mental help. If you are close to Kevin and want to defend a rapist & woman beater, that is your right, but do not try to smear her good name. Let me guess, his FOUR ex wives needed help too-right? They lied about where they got their bruises after being beat by him and filing charges? I guess I agree, any woman who is abused by a "man" & stays with him him hoping he will change, does indeed need help. The fact that you would encourage anyone to read the bible in reference to this case is pathetic. If you have read the bible why would you not be quoting 'do unto others', which is now my favorite as I hope that Kevin's jailmates will do just that. I am just glad that her children were not home when he attacked her. Please do not use him to represent the Military as I have the utmost respect for all of our men & women in the service, but they are also not above the law and should be punished accordingly when they comit a crime. Justice will prevail."
Follow up to a quote: wrote on February 16, 2007 11:26 PM:""And the person that you are referring too is truly the definition of a person in need of true mental health care. I'm not being mean about that, it's just fact" They were talking about the Defendant. I guess you do know what you are talking about! "
After it's all said and done wrote on February 17, 2007 12:17 PM:"A convicted felon can't work at Wal-mart or Home Depot. "
Leave Your Comment
Name:
Comments:
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment